Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud storage pricing varies depending on which of the three storage services you use—object storage (S3), block storage (EBS), or file storage (EFS). Automatically scales as you add or remove files, with no need to provision storage capacity in advance. EBS (or it's LAN-like equivalent EFS) is the only choice (out of the 2 being explored) if your file is going to be frequently updated (e. . You can allocate any amount of memory to your function between 128 MB and 10,240 MB, in 1 MB increments. EFS offers high performance up to 10 GB/sec and 500,000 IOPS. In a physical environment this volume might be coming from storage or a server. Entire data is stored in fixed-size blocks that have unique addresses. Another low-redundancy option of this storage class is Amazon S3 Reduced Redundancy Storage, or RRS. The new S3 Infrequently Accessed allows you to reduce cloud costs further without sacrificing recovery time. As per the name, Elastic grows as your data grows. Lustre also has deep integrations with Amazon S3. The question is asking the most cost-efficient storage option, which should be Glacier. AWS Storage Summed Up. 6 ms. Finally, Amazon S3 is an object store good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. EFS is a file storage service for use with Amazon compute (EC2, containers, serverless) and on-premises servers. In your opinion, does it make sense to use Amazon EFS for database backup from a cost perspective? 2. Amazon Glacier was built for the long term storage and the digital archiving of data, as opposed to frequent utilization. 00 per provisioned MB/s-month. Used when a lot of information has to be stored at the lowest price. When the contents within your S3 bucket change, it'll automatically update the FSx file system to show these changes. is an object store with a simple key, value store design, and good at storing vast numbers of backups or user files. In a physical environment this volume might be coming from storage or a server. S3 is a blob storage, with no structure, no data types, items can't be updated only replaced. . Yet despite these differences, Amazon EC2 and Amazon S3 complement each other in significant ways. 10 per GB for EBS), you have to pay once for each EFS file system. EBS is a high-performance per-instance block storage system designed to act as storage for a single EC2 instance (most of the time) EFS is a highly scalable file storage system designed to provide flexible storage for multiple EC2 instances. 30 per GB-month; Infrequent access storage: $0. Amazon's pricing assumes a savings of 50% and reduces the cost of HDD storage in the U. With Amazon S3 as a data source, you can choose between File mode, FastFile mode, and Pipe mode: File mode – SageMaker copies a. And if it is lower, its returns are 10-100% of the cost as service credits. However, interesting difference is between EFS and S3, and to identify proper use cases for it. There are products that solve this problem for you, such as S3, DynamoDB, Elasticache Redis or Memcached. But if you code can handle S3 (download from it, use the files, upload the results), then S3 is a better option. Amazon EFS comes packed with some great features such as. In this Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS, we will discuss the differences between Amazon S3, EBS, and EFS. 741,611 professionals have used our research since 2012. When mounting your file systems on Amazon EC2 instances, Amazon EFS supports the Network File System version 4. However, in terms of performance, EBS and EFS are superior to S3, with stronger throughput and the lowest latency. Cloud Solutions. To use the One Zone–IA storage class, you must enable. Following Follow. 30 per hour (and charged by hour) Data uploads. However, there are various other pricing parameters in S3, including cost per number of requests made, S3 Analytics, and data transfer out of S3 per gigabyte. Create Fake File. The default EFS backup plan uses the AWS Backup recommended settings for automatic backups—daily backups with a 35-day retention period. Amazon EFS (Elastic File. Elastic Block Storage (EBS). S3 is suitable for a write-once, read-multiple-time approach, as it can be configured for access from anywhere. . 1)For Video streaming am planning to use Nodejs and S3 but the point is, if a video is 1. Amazon EFS simplifies scaling storage for you. You’ll also want to consider compression schemes. Amazon EFS vs. Like other cloud storage options, EFS requires balancing convenience with cost. Cancel. However, for external storage, sharing files and folders is deactivated by default. In terms of security, both AWS EFS and Azure File Storage offer robust security measures. Cost of EFS vs. If you store more than 50 TB per month, the next 450 TB will be charged at $0. Uploading into S3 from the internet is free. AWS Backup pricing is composed of two elements—storage costs and data transfer costs, and we’ll help you understand how to estimate and calculate your. For large files workloads, ObjectiveFS has 400–460 MB/s for reading and writing directly to S3 and is 3. In this article, we explain what Amazon EBS is and how pricing is calculated to help you avoid overspending on your AWS bill. Create a bucket policy that limits access to only the application tier running in the VPC. Cost: EFS is approximately 10 times costly than S3. Amazon S3 . Cost Implications: S3’s Intelligent Tiering is cost-effective for varied access patterns. 8. Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) is a set-and-forget, serverless, simple elastic file system that can be used with on-premises resources and AWS Cloud services. Viewed 1. $/Utilized GB per Month. Create a bucket policy to make the objects in the S3 bucket public. Elastic Block Storage (EBS). Bash. Share. The Standard storage class is the default storage used when using EFS. S3 is an object storage system, designed to provide archiving and data control options. 999999999 percent (11 9s) durability and up to. For example, a provisioned EBS volume of 500 GB with 1,000 IOPs would cost $162. Amazon Elastic File System costs. Block Storage. 045-0. 77. Some AWS services only support using FSx (Windows ECS containers). This file system is being replicated to the China (Beijing. In single model architecture, you have a single ML inference model that performs the inference for all incoming requests. EC2 Auto Scaling automatically increases or decreases the number of required EC2 instances depending. AWS EFS vs EBS vs S3 (differences & when to use?) Asked Apr 11 '15 at 08:43. If you need one networked drive attached to the file system of several EC2 instance / containers simultaneously then go with EFS. 04 per gigabyte (GB) transferred. 01 per GB transferred). Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) is rated 8. 6, while Amazon S3 is rated 8. Pros and Cons. Two…For AWS US East (N. Chose Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) S3 and EBS/EFS both host files, but they are very different. EBS vs EFS – Pricing. 6 ms. offers pay for the. Cost-effective. Let’s break it down and see where each shines. You can also use a shared EFS file system to share other types of data, such as configuration files or even the state of circuit breakers. EFS is $0. Amazon EFS Features. But I am not sure what to use where? Apr 9, 2018 in Cloud Computing by code_ninja. 0125 per GB-month for the EBS Snapshots Archive storage, you are charged $2. 2. In a Region that charges $0. 2. 3/month. 743,467 professionals have used our research since 2012. Scalability: Amazon S3 and EFS are highly scalable while EBS is hardly scalable. Each object in Amazon S3 has a storage class associated with it. ”. Data downloads. The distributed design of Amazon EFS avoids the. Cost of backup evaluations = 3000 backup evaluations x ($1. On the other hand, the top reviewer of Amazon S3 Glacier writes "A cost-effective solution to reduce storage. Free Tier — 5 GB storage, 20000 Get Requests, 2000 Put Requests. The Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) provides a simple, scalable, elastic file system for Linux-based workloads for use with AWS Cloud services and on-premises resources. EFS Intelligent-Tiering is designed to help you achieve the right price and performance blend for your application file data by. Amazon EFS vs. It barely beats a single io2 Block Express EBS volume (5GB/sec EFS vs. You can use S3 Intelligent-Tiering as the default storage class for virtually any workload, especially data lakes, data analytics, new applications, and user-generated content. Buyer's Guide. $0. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparision. 30/GB vs S3’s $0. However you must keep in mind that GP2’s performance is proportional to its volume capacity, so to have higher performance, you must provision a volume with higher storage capacity. EFS provides a file system interface, file system access semantics (such as strong consistency and file locking), and concurrently accessible storage for up to thousands of EC2 instances. This transparent approach lets you easily calculate costs and align them with your storage needs. Pay only for the storage you use and reduce costs up to 92 percent by automatically moving infrequently accessed files. 3. Cloud Professional Services Rates. 20. ¥ 0. Choosing an Amazon FSx File System. From your hard drive in the. From this, you can see that for the same amount of storage space, gp3 is 20 percent more cost-effective than gp2 volumes. However, Infrequent Access is generally used if you're storing data on EFS that is rarely accessed. S3/EBS/EFS and Azure Storage. Standard retrievals allow you to access your archived data in three to five hours and cost $0. Can be accessed concurrently by multiple Amazon EC2 instances, allowing them to share data. S3, EBS, EFS. Networked file systems have inherent tradeoffs over local filesystem access—EFS doesn't change that. 021-0. Storage class for automatically optimizing data with changing or unknown access patterns. There are no additional AWS Transfer Family charges for using Amazon EFS as the storage backend, but storing data on Amazon EFS is significantly more expensive than on Amazon S3. Integration with Other AWS. 1755 per GB. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparision. Other metrics, such as access frequency, can be opted into at a low cost. 065 / IOPS / month: N/A: EFS:Enterprises typically compare EFS to S3 and EBS when they weigh their AWS storage options. To know whether EFS truly is the best option for you, you’ll want to compare it to your other two main options, EBS and S3. When an application requires a shared file system that is not I/O sensitive and requires POSIX compliance (so it can provide file permissions, for example). EFS Standard tier storage costs $0. EBS (or it's LAN-like equivalent EFS) is the only choice (out of the 2 being explored) if your file is going to be frequently updated (e. Amazon S3 Standard. The top reviewer of Amazon EBS (Elastic Block Store) writes "A tool to deal with not only servers having low space but also the migration of servers". S3 provides seemingly unlimited storage that can be scaled effortlessly. Amazon FSx is billed with a combination of provisioned storage and provisioned throughput. 1 provides better performance for parallel small-file read operations (greater than 10,000 files per second) compared to NFSv4. For Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), you can use Amazon S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR) to asynchronously copy objects to an S3 bucket in the DR region continuously, while providing versioning for the stored objects so that you can choose your restoration point. Alternatively, you might need to build key-value or blob/object storage system depending on the level of structure and retrieval you need. S3 vs EBS vs EFS. Although this storage has the same availability SLA of 99. EFS stands for Elastic File System and is a file-level storage option for use with AWS. In the first scenario, involving 1TB of total storage replicated across two AZs, the total cost of ownership was $3,686 under AWS EFS pricing, and $9,457 using a self-managed solution. To use the One Zone–IA storage class, you must enable. 99% availability making it a very good choice for users with critical applications. It is cost-optimized, due to no provisioning requirements, and no purchase commitments. Rate this Article. Answer – S3 is object storage and latency is higher than EBS and EFS we can host/install OS or application on it, EBS is block storage and it the default storage with Ec2 instance we can attach 1 EBS with 1 instance. EFS is a file system. Amazon’s EFS service is fully elastic, meaning it grows and shrinks as files are added or removed. Logging and Monitoring in Amazon S3. Amazon Elastic File System (EFS) Score 8. Table 1 – Feature comparison between Amazon AWS Cloud Storage Options and Services – S3 vs. How is the answer - "Cost of test file storage on S3 Standard < Cost of test file storage on EFS < Cost of test file storage on EBS". DOWNLOAD NOW. The full form of Amazon EFS is Amazon Elastic File System. 1/Month (depends on speed – SSD or not) + IOPS costs; EFS: $0. It is important to mention that S3 tagging has a maximum limit of 10 tags per object and 128 unicode character. AWS EFS is also called AWS Elastic File System. I guess with S3 you have to use the SDK where as with EFS being a file system you can use standard I/O methods from your programming language of choice to create files. S3 Standard Storage. 05 per GB. Since most of you are familiar with S3, I will not talk about it in detail. That’s a significant difference that can add up quickly. Here are the breakdowns for each option. Time protocol is enabled on your endpoint. S3 Lifecycle Transition request pricing below represents requests to that storage class. To do this when creating a file system using the console, choose Availability and Durability, and then choose One Zone. Glacier has a very low storage cost, but a higher. 99% availability by redundantly storing data across. S3 does not support NFS. 2. Unlike EBS and EFS, S3 is not bound to EC2 instances. 8e+01k times 384. SC1 HDD → Lowest cost per GB of all EBS volume types. 30 per hour (and charged by hour) Data uploads. You choose a class depending on your use case. S3 – hundreds and thousands of put/get operations against S3 may start to feature on your AWS invoice. Cost savings: Using S3 to store data helps the users save costs and ensure a high level of. 023 per GB Per month through first 50 TB, then the price goes down. Under Configuration, for Location type, select Amazon EFS file system. EBS stands for Elastic Block Store and is a block-level storage option for use with […]It's fully atomic, eventually consistent, higher latency than GlusterFS or even NFS. 5GB, the time to fetch the video from s3 to node is very high. 023 / GB-month. $0. Amazon Glacier and Amazon S3 are primarily classified as "Data Backup" and "Cloud Storage" tools respectively. Now you are able to share the folders located on Amazon S3 as you would with any other Nextcloud folders. The storage layer uses Amazon EFS with both Standard and Infrequent Access storage classes, and Intelligent-tiering enabled. Amazon EFS and Amazon FSx can be mounted onto. 05 per GB-month in the US-East region. AWS EFS. In the navigation pane, choose Tasks. Amazon charges separately for storage by GB, and separately for the number of objects stored in S3, to compensate for the cost of processing the data to identify the optimal tier for each one. AWS Snowball, AWS Snowball Edge: Data transfer out to the Internet incurs a region-specific charge of $0. Offers cost-saving storage classes ideal for infrequently access data or for data archival; provides unlimited storage There are two types of ML inferencing architectures, single model and multi-model. 20 per month + 6000 IOPS = 3000 Free + 3000 * $0. 3. 01 per GB for HDD storage to £0. EFS follows a pay-as-you-go model, while FSx pricing hinges on type and capacity. February 16, 2021. Share. EFS follows a pay-as-you-go model, while FSx pricing hinges on type and capacity. Identity Pool What is it? Use Cases How this works? and more. 04 * 1 GB/day * 30 days = $1. For large reads that can be cached in the memory cache, we see a throughput of 2. 1 What is Amazon S3 1. Many of these have been resolved over the last couple of. Storage cost is based on the average storage used through the month. Files stored within an S3 bucket can be accessed programmatically or directly from services such as AWS CloudFront. File system access is via the NFS protocol. How it works. It’s easy to get confused with. 2. Alternatively, you might need to build key-value or blob/object storage system depending on the level of structure and retrieval you need. Storage cost is based on the average storage used through the month. More than 700,000 data lakes run on AWS. One last note, these settings may be enough for many WordPress installations but in some cases, you have to optimize further. Cost $368. Some AWS services only support using EFS (AWS Lambda, Linux ECS containers). Lastly, the cost of AWS DataSync is quite straight forward too. The cost of using the AWS EFS Infrequent Access tier storage is drastically lower—$0. AWS Backup is a service that helps you centrally manage backups across multiple Amazon storage services, including EFS, DynamoDB, RDS, and AWS snapshots performed via EBS. 1 out of 10. AWS EFS vs EBS vs S3. The AWS Elastic File System (EFS) is one of Amazon’s three primary storage solutions. Automatically scales as you add or remove files, with no need to provision storage capacity in advance. You don’t even have to pay for files that are less accessible, and it can automatically expand when clients need more storage, and you don’t have to pay. Like S3, EFS has multiple storage classes. EBS and EFS both outperform Amazon S3 in terms of IOPS and. S3 Glacier Deep Archive: The lowest-cost storage class for long-term data archiving, with the longest retrieval times. 999999999% (11 9s) of data durability and 99. When you copy objects containing file system metadata back to file formats, the original file metadata (that DataSync copied to S3) is restored. It is calculated by the data copied TO and FROM S3 and EFS, which is US$0. Amazon FSx for Windows File Server. Elastic File Store – EFS provides a simple, fully managed, easy to set up, scalable, serverless, and cost-optimized file storage for use with AWS Cloud and on-premises resources. To summarize EBS volumes are for host storage, S3 volumes are for overall storage, and EFS is used when you need network storage for computing systems. Choosing the right Amazon cloud storage solution can significantly impact your application’s performance, scalability, and cost-efficiency. 2/MonthS3 Glacier Deep Archive is a cost-effective and easy-to-manage alternative to tape. 0125 per GB-month for the EBS Snapshots Archive storage, you are charged $2. All of these can already be centrally controlled. The core difference in the EFS vs S3 use case is EFS is designed to be attached to the file as a networked drive where as S3 is designed to be accessed via an API. 0065 per GB per month, while SSD storage cost reduces to $0. A mazon S3: Amazon S3 storage costs $0. Amazon S3 is a cost-effective storage service, and it provides different storage classes that offer different levels of durability, availability, and retrieval times. Elastic Block Storage (EBS) Elastic File System (EFS) S3 (Simple Storage Service) ecosystem along with Glacier. 023/GB/month for the first 50 Terabytes; this decreases as you consume more Terabytes of storage. 0133$ per GB a month for one-zone storage. offers pay for the. Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) provides scalable network file systems for use with EC2 instances. 3. 017 $ per hour and an additional 0. For large data that isn’t already compressed, you almost certainly want to — S3 bandwidth and cost constraints generally make compression worth it. It is simple to use. 6, while Microsoft Azure File Storage is rated 8. This means that your backup storage for these resources is billed for the whole day. When enabled, lifecycle management migrates files that have not been accessed for a set period of time to the EFS Standard–Infrequent Access (Standard-IA) or One Zone–Infrequent Access (One Zone-IA) storage class, depending on your file system. PDF RSS. 30 per GB-month for storage and an additional $6. Amazon EBS is much easier to use than Amazon S3 and EFS (Elastic File System) because its cause. Active Aug 14 '22 at 05:01. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparision. 8. There is no minimum price or setup cost with Amazon EFS, and you just pay for what you use. 10 for EBS vs $0. Performance: AWS file storage solutions are optimized for performance and can deliver high throughput and low-latency access to data, making. A: AWS Transfer Family offers fully managed support for the transfer of files over SFTP, AS2, FTPS, and FTP directly into and out of Amazon S3 or Amazon EFS. Cost is a key parameter to consider if you are considering migrating to Google Cloud or switching to any other different cloud provider. A guide to AWS storage cost. The key difference is that EBS is elastic (easily scalable and extensible) compared to a. $0. Configure a VPC gateway endpoint for Amazon S3 within the VPC. AWS EFS vs other NFS storage Hey guys, I hope you guys are all well and safe from covid. Store the data in Amazon S3 Glacier. It is a scalable, cloud-based file system supporting Linux-based applications and workloads that can work in tandem with AWS cloud services and on-premise resources. However, choosing a storage option is not easy since each of them has unique features and costs. January 29. EFS is expensive pricesely because it uses S3 to store files that aren't commonly retrieved. Amazon Storage Services: EFS vs EBS vs S3. See full list on dzone. Quickly learn Amazon S3 vs EBS vs EFS. 0004 per 1000 GET, SELECT, and other requests. configured S3 buckets are accessible using the NFS and SMB protocol;. See top. AWS EFS vs. 065 per month. 743,467 professionals have used our research since 2012. There are multiple storage classes available in Amazon S3. 025 per GB per month. S3 is eventually consistent. ) Block storage for an EC2 instance:741,611 professionals have used our research since 2012. The EFS uses the NFS protocol and can scale up to petabytes. You can run data analytics on your data in S3. Data in EFS is accessed via file paths. $0. The same file from S3 (same region, with Gateway Endpoint) takes 5,100ms on average. The number of GET requests to S3 will increase so your S3 cost will increase as well. Working of AWS EFS; AWS EFS vs S3 vs EBS; AWS EFS pricing; Conclusion; Check out this AWS full course video by Intellipaat. S3 is suitable for a write-once, read-multiple-time approach, as it can be configured for access from anywhere. Chose Amazon S3 (Simple Storage Service) S3 and EBS/EFS both host files, but they are very different. It depends on your specific use-cases and softwares but here's some basic guideline. AWS SFTP pricing can be broken down as such: Endpoint fee: $0. The costs associated with Amazon FSx for Lustre differs to that of Windows File Server. · DevOps Explore the AWS storage options: Elastic Block Storage (EBS), Elastic File System (EFS), and Simple Storage Service (S3). The evolution of such a migration is to move the files to S3 which is a more scalable and cost-effective solution. 20 = $217. Let’s say that you temporarily restore the 200 GB snapshot from the archive tier for a period of 15 days. D. 022, saving you a dollar per TB. Nearline & Coldline. With Amazon S3 as a data source, you can choose between File mode, FastFile mode, and Pipe mode: File mode – SageMaker. Amazon's pricing (estimation) calculator for EFS (Elastic File System) asks to enter the average GB (or TB) of storage used per month. This also can increase costs via per-request fees AND negatively affects your user experience and SEO, as page load speed is considered. 172. DOWNLOAD NOW. AWS FSx for Lustre vs EFS: Head to Head FSx for Lustre is an entirely managed service that offers high-performance, scalable, cost-effective storage for compute workloads. Which is costlier EFS or EBS? Amazon EFS is almost 10 times more expensive than Amazon EBS pricing, but the cheaper Amazon EBS can only be accessed by one Amazon EC2 instance at a time. Amazon Elastic File System is cost-effective as you have to pay as low as 0. S3 vs EBS vs EFS Comparison Table. One allows you to run servers in the cloud with minimal effort on your part, while the other is designed for storing large amounts of static data and ideal for data backups. EFS provides a file system interface, file system access semantics (such as strong consistency and file locking), and concurrently. Let’s say that you temporarily restore the 200 GB snapshot from the archive tier for a period of 15 days. To keep you on top of your data, AWS allows you to set up monitoring for your storage in seconds. This has an approximately 13x multiple over S3 — costing $0. 1)For Video streaming am planning to use Nodejs and S3 but the point is, if a video is 1. 1/Month (depends on speed – SSD or not) + IOPS costs; EFS: $0. 0125. And S3 would be an alternate solution if you want to download/upload the files/objects with different clients platforms like Android, iOS, Web etc. Create a DataSync task with the EFS file system as the source location and the S3 bucket as the destination location: Open the AWS DataSync console. $0. The model is stored either in S3, ECR (via OCI deployment with Lambda), or EFS and is then used by a compute service such as Lambda. EBS vs. SSD pricing starts at $0. S3 Intelligent-Tiering is the only cloud. Amazon EFS D. Amazon S3 Standard Infrequent Access. S3's standard tier costs $0. First 50 TB / month. Details are available at: Amazon S3 Simple Storage Service Pricing - Amazon Web Services S3 Standard storage (2. The top reviewer of Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) writes "A solution with good technical support that needs to improve its stability". Storage Amazon EFS When to Choose Amazon EFS Amazon EFS provides simple, scalable, elastic file storage for use with compute instances on the AWS Cloud and on-premises servers. Using Amazon S3 storage classes. Store the data in an Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) file system. Compared to AWS Lambda, EC2 runs a full copy of the operating system and all the. 1 What. 3/Month. SFTP data upload and download: At $0. When copying data to Amazon S3, DataSync automatically converts each file to a single S3 object in a 1:1 relationship, and preserves POSIX metadata from NFS shares or HDFS as Amazon S3 object metadata. EFS. Basic object storage that makes data available through an Internet accessible API. Part 2: [this blog post] A deep dive on how EFS security works in container deployments based on ECS and Fargate with some high-level considerations around regional ECS and EFS deployments best practices. Reference the S3 developer guide for technical details on Data Retrievals. EBS and EFS both outperform Amazon S3 in terms of IOPS and latency. Given the hidden compute and support costs, security integration, and performance issues, S3 as a data platform for RDBMS-sourced, frequently-refreshed data is a far cry from its $23/TB/month promise. Amazon EFS (Elastic File System) is rated 8. Amazon S3, FSx, Elastic File System and Elastic Block Store have different price structures, but data use remains the top factor in determining the cost of cloud storage. If same amount of data is kept in EBS (General Purpose SSD. Amazon EFS uses NFS V4. With Amazon EFS, you can create a file system, mount the file system on an Amazon EC2 instance, and then read and write data to and from your file system. Whichever type of volume you choose, if you decide to back the volume up using S3 snapshots, you'll be charged $0. To enable that, navigate to the setup page of your external storage and open the advanced menu (three dots) and select “Enable Sharing. S3 is object storage. Amazon web services are widely used around the world for storage options. Cold HDD (sc1): slower than st1, but cheaper at only $0. Solution: 3. 25c/GB) is replicated across the region, is instantly. It’s easy to get confused with. So in my scenario, I will copy 10TB of data to S3 and assume that I will copy 10TB out as well, the total cost not including S3 would be. This post on stack is also a good read AWS EFS vs EBS vs S3 (differences & when to use?)The example is focused on costs directly related to EFS Replication. 1. Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS), Amazon Simple Storage Service (Amazon S3), and Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) are all different storage systems provided by Amazon.